Sexting attracts teens to Blackberry Messenger

Sexting is bad according to LG Electronics, but it may be good for RIM, which has seen a record number of teens and young people signing up for a blackberry over the past year, attracted mainly by the magnetic pull of its Blackberry Messenger service.

<!–break–>

"A lot of kids say they would rather a Blackberry than an iPhone because of BBM," a Blackberry spokeswoman told TG Daily at a Mobile World Congress (MWC) press event on Monday night. 

Sexting attracts teens to Blackberry Messenger"They like to be able to message their friends, and even flirt with random strangers" she added, alluding to a phenomenon by which people search for others’ Blackberry PINs online.

Just what parents want their 16 year old sons and daughters to be doing.

This also blazes a new trail for RIM, which has – until very lately – been almost exclusively focused on the enterprise and business user. But teens seem to flocking to Blackberry in droves, with the number one reason being the free messaging service which makes SMSing friends somewhat obsolete.

"Over the past few months I’ve started to see a lot of young girls and guys, teenagers and university students choosing Blackberry because they realize its social and rich media capabilities," the Blackberry spokeswoman told us. 

"Young people want a phone that lets them use Facebook, Twitter, MSN, video, has a decent camera, and we have all that. Plus, the attraction of Blackberry is proving to be a very strong incentive."

Guess Sexting sells.

Google Says Buzz Needed Wider Testing, Issuing Fixes This Week [Updates]

In one week, Google’s Buzz social network has moved through a splashy launch, a quick fix, a major clean-up, and now, an apology. Buzz’s product manager says his team is “very, very sorry,” and that (more) fixes are coming this week.

Todd Jackson, Buzz product manager, tells BBC News that Buzz was tested internally by 20,000 Google employees and affiliates, but that wider public testing should have been solicited before launching. The BBC post offers a decent summation of the problems users and privacy advocates have pointed out, like the public sharing of followers and followees (which has since been tweaked).

Yada, yada, so what’s going to happen now? Jackson says “transparency and control” improvements would be going live “this week.”

Other possible changes include a better “preferences menu” that will allow users to better tailor what appears in their inbox, and a more prominent “mute” option to switch the service off.

Another idea, said Mr Jackson, was to create a separate service that was not part of Gmail.

“We think that integration with Gmail was absolutely the right way to go – we wanted to make Buzz easily accessible to people,” he said. “We also want to give people who don’t use Gmail the ability to use Buzz, so we’re exploring the idea of offering a separate destination site.”

The most recently announced changes would go live “this week”, he added.

Better still, Jackson says the changes and features are being bug tested and translated into 53 languages, so a full-fledged overhaul should come for everyone very soon.

It’s reassuring to see Google acknowledge its flaws and move quickly to address its users’ issues. Then again, their trial-and-error is being staged with users’ address books. What else would you want to see Buzz fix, as long as they’ve got the scalpel and sutures out?






Windows Phone 7 Interface: Microsoft Has Out-Appled Apple [UI Design]

I’m sorry, Cupertino, but Microsoft has nailed it. Windows Phone 7 feels like an iPhone from the future. The UI has the simplicity and elegance of Apple’s industrial design, while the iPhone’s UI still feels like a colorized Palm Pilot.

That doesn’t mean that the Windows Phone 7’s user experience would be better than Apple’s. The two user interface concepts—data-centric vs function-centric—are very different, and the former is quite a radical departure from what people are used to.

And if you’re not familiar with Windows Phone 7, check out our hands on and the post where we explain everything about it.

With the iPhone, Apple put together an extremely simple modal interface that works, one that people of all ages and backgrounds understand right away: “This is a device that adopts different functions and gives me access to different kinds of information depending on the icon I click on.”

It’s pretty simple idea, which made it a raging success. In fact, that success is the reason why this model is Apple’s bet not only for mobile phones, but for the future of computing. It is also the reason why the Androids, Palms, and Blackberries of this world are following them.

Clean slate

Microsoft’s approach is completely different. Instead of becoming another me-too cellphone, like Android and the rest, the Windows Phone 7 team came up their own vision of what the cellphone should be. In the process, they have created a beautiful user interface in which the data is at the center of user interaction. Not the apps—specific functions—but the information itself. At some points, in fact, it feels like the information is the interface itself.

Out of the box, this information is organized into areas called hubs, which follow the user's areas of interest. Accessible through live tiles in the home screen, the Me (the user), people, pictures and video, music, and games—plus the omnipresent search—hubs give views into several data sources, connecting and presenting them into an interweaved panoramic stream. These hubs dig heavily into many databases, both locally and into the cloud.

Rather than accessing an app to get contact information and make a call to a person, open another app to get her Twitter updates, and then another app to get her Facebook updates, and another for her latest mails to you, and yet another one to watch her photos, the Windows Phone’s people hub offers a seamless view into all of it, presented in a very simple and logical way. On a function-centric model like the iPhone, when the user thinks “I want to make a call”, he puts the device in “calling mode” by clicking on an app, selects a contact, and calls. When the user thinks “What’s up with John Smith?” he puts the device in Facebook or Twitter or Mail mode, and so on.

Microsoft has organized the hubs into panoramas, by stitching groups of information as columns of a single landscape screen—bigger than the phone's display—that can be scrolled with your finger. The solution—tied together with minimalist interface aesthetics and animations that are inviting, elegant, and never superfluous—works great.

What about other applications?

Instinctively, I like Microsoft's approach to organizing the core of our digital lives—people+social+multimedia+communication all merged into the hubs. I like it better than the "it's a phone, it's a mail program, it's a browser, it's an iPod" Apple approach. It's less rigid than the iPhone or Android's model, offering a richer experience, inviting to explore, and offering data from many points of view in a quick, clearly organized way. It also seems more human, and that's certainly something Apple—or their followers—have to worry about.

Does that mean that function-centric models are worse? Like I said before, not necessarily. Especially because the information-centric panoramas don’t fit every single task people expect their iPhones to perform now. And when I say every single task, I really mean the two gazillion apps populating the Apple store. Microsoft could dress the hub experience in any way they want, but if their devices don’t offer a rich application market, they will fail the same way the current competition is failing against Apple.

Fortunately for Microsoft, the Windows Phone model is not only information-centric, but also function-centric. According to Joe Belfiore, gran jefe of the Microsoft’s Windows Phone Program, applications are not required to plug into the hub metaphor or the panorama user interface. When the development toolkit comes out in a month, it will encourage applications just like the ones you have in the iPhone today. In other words, Microsoft understands that one approach is as important as the other.

They are just hoping that their hubs would be a better, funner, more intuitive way to access and cultivate our digital lives, which is mainly what most consumers want to do nowadays. Looking at what they have shown today, I think they may be in the right track. But, like the Zune HD, it just may be too late.






Xbox LIVE coming to Windows Phones 7 series

From the Microsoft Press Release:
[QUOTE]
Gamer on the go? Now you can take many of your favorite Xbox 360 experiences with you, wherever you are. Xbox LIVE – the leading online game and entertainment service in your living room – will be available in your pocket for the first time this holiday on Windows Phone 7 Series. Unveiled by Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer today at Mobile World Congress 2010, the Windows Phone 7 Series games hub featuring Xbox LIVE unlocks a world of games, fun and a community of more than 23 million active members to Windows Phone 7 Series users around the world.

The games hub will provide many popular Xbox LIVE gaming and community features found on the Xbox 360 today, including the ability to:
* Collect Achievements and build your Gamerscore
* View Xbox LIVE leaderboards
* See your Xbox LIVE Avatar
* Access Spotlight feeds, including the latest tips and tricks, game news, updates and more
* Add Xbox LIVE friends to your friends list while out on the go
* Turn-based (asynchronous) multiplayer gaming

“Windows Phone 7 Series was built from the ground up with entertainment in mind, and its unique design allowed us to bring some of the best gaming and community features of Xbox LIVE to the Windows mobile platform,” said Ron Pessner, general manager of Xbox LIVE Mobile. “It has always been our vision to expand the Xbox LIVE service to connect people to their games, entertainment and friends wherever they go, and the launch of Windows Phone 7 Series is an important step toward that goal.”

To watch the full replay of Steve Ballmer’s press conference at Mobile World Congress, and to experience Windows Phone 7 Series through an online product demo please visit: www.microsoft.com/news/windowsphone.
[/QUOTE]

YouTube Disco Brings Music Discovery to YouTube [YouTube]

YouTube has launched a music discovery service, fueled by YouTube’s inventory of music videos, called YouTube Disco.

Click on the image above for a closer look.

Presently it isn't the most advanced music discovery service around but it could be the easiest to use. You have two options when searching YouTube Disco. You can search for an artist or song and hear more songs by that artist—you might discover something new but it will be within the artist's own discography—or you can search for music related to the song or artist you initially searched for.

In the screenshot above, songs related to Queen appear in the left-hand column whereas songs directly in the Queen discography appear in the right-hand column. From the right-hand column you can browse through artist videos—the default view—or select mixes of related music or related artists.

For other ways to discover new music check out previously reviewed Radio Tuna, Project Playlist, and Source Tone.

Have a favorite music discovery tool? Let’s hear about it in the comments.






Olympic roundup: What Canada did on Day 3

It took more than 34 years to do it, but a Canadian has won an Olympic gold medal on home soil – Alexandre Bilodeau’s name entered sports history books Sunday when he grabbed first place in the men’s moguls at the Vancouver Games.

Buzz Drops Auto-Following, Won’t Automatically Connect to Google Services, Adds Better Disable [Updates]

After a week’s worth of complaints and confusion, Google is updating Buzz to address many of the privacy concerns and annoyances raised by the new social networking service. The update brings three major changes.

First, they’ve replaced the auto-follow feature with auto-suggestions, letting you choose who you follow individually rather than automatically following everyone Google thinks you’d want to. Second, Buzz will stop automatically connecting to public Picasa Web Albums and Reader shared items. You can still connect these things, but you’ve got more choice. Finally, they’ve added a Buzz tab to your Gmail settings to give you finer control over how Buzz integrates with Gmail. From there, you can easily change whether or not other users can see who you're following via your Google Profile, turn off Buzz in Gmail, or turn off Buzz completely—something I suspect a lot of people will want to do. (The Buzz tab isn't available yet, and they do say "we're adding“, but hopefully it’ll be there soon.)

The mea culpa from the Official Gmail Blog:

It’s been an exciting and challenging week for the Buzz team. We’ve been getting feedback via the Gmail help forums and emails from friends and family, and we’ve also been able to do something new: read the buzz about Buzz itself. We quickly realized that we didn’t get everything quite right. We’re very sorry for the concern we’ve caused and have been working hard ever since to improve things based on your feedback. We’ll continue to do so.

What do you think? Do these changes make Buzz a little more attractive, or are you already turned off by all the negative buzz about Buzz? Let’s hear it in the comments.






Desktop Fun: Valentine’s Day

Are you looking for some unique wallpapers to express the feelings in your heart this year? Then you will want to have a look through our special Valentine’s Day collection.

Note: Click on the picture to see the full-size image—these wallpapers vary in size so you may need to crop, stretch, or place them on a colored background in order to best match them to your screen’s resolution.

666val 

2val

3val

4val 

5val 

6

7jpg 

8val 

9val

10val 

11val

44val 

12val

13val

14val 

Looking for some great post-holiday wallpapers? Then be certain to look through our growing collection of themed wallpapers for your desktop.

How-To Geek Wallpaper Collections

Got an opinion to share? Click here to join the discussion

Similar Articles Productive Geek Tips
Latest Software Reviews Tinyhacker Random Tips

Full Screen Weather Is a Giant, No-Frills Weather Map [Weather]

We’ve always liked Weather Underground for its no-nonsense, real-time weather info. Today they’ve released a new service called Full Screen Weather that mashes up Google Maps with weather data for nothing but maps and up-to-the-minute weather info.

(Click the image above for a closer look.)

Just point your browser to fullscreenweather.com, enter your ZIP code, and get browsing. By default the map displays temperatures as measured from stations across Weather Underground’s extensive reporting areas, but you can also switch to Precipitation and Cloud views (you can even play back cloud or precipitation movement over time). In the bottom-left of the window you get an overview of current conditions and a four-day forecast, with links to more extensive forecasts on Weather Underground proper.

The site is clean, simple, lightweight, and ad-free—which is to say, pretty great.

Full Screen Weather [Weather Underground]






Where Can I Watch the Olympics Online? [Ask Lifehacker]

Dear Lifehacker,
I’m a huge fan of the winter Olympics and I don’t want to miss a minute of coverage. Where can I watch the games online?

Signed,
Curling Rocks My World

Photo by garrettbh.

Dear Curling,

We’re big fans, too, and want to slurp up all the coverage we can find, so here’s how we’re planning to attack the games online this year.

Note: We’ll update this post as the games begin (and continue) and we find more sources, better options, or more details about what is and isn’t working out, so you may want to bookmark this one for later.

Figure Out When Your Must-Watch Events Are Happening

The first thing to check out is a schedule of events so you know exactly when your favorite events are taking place. The event’s official website, Vancouver 2010, has the complete schedule of both the Olympic and Paralympic games, and will be continually updated with results as they come in.

Track Down the Games Online

Once you’ve figured out what you want to see, it’s time to track it down online. Many live streams of the events can be accessed right from Vancouver 2010, which routes you into the nationally televised broadcasting stations of dozens of countries. Though we can’t say for sure until the games start, this will probably be a great way to view coverage of specific teams and athletes since each nation will likely favor coverage of its stars. In other words, if you want to track every movement of the German bobsled team, streaming one of Germany’s live broadcasts will probably serve you well.

Be aware that some websites will sniff out your location and block you from viewing if you’re outside that particular country, so you may need to try several streams until you find one that works for you. Alternatively, you could try using a proxy service like xroxy or proxify, but make sure you’re not violating the website’s or your ISP’s terms of service before you do. (Also, proxies significantly slow down your bandwidth, so don’t expect great video.)

Watching the Olympics Online in the U.S.

Stateside viewers who mainly want to keep track of American athletes and teams will want to check out NBC’s official 2010 Winter Olympics video page as well as their local listings advisor. From the listings advisor, enter your zip code and cable, satellite, or antennaed-television provider to call up a list of what channels in your area are televising the event. From there, you can hit up the individual local networks to see if they’re offering live streaming on their web sites. Smaller stations may not be, but you might get lucky in some of the country’s major metropolitan areas.

And Elsewhere…

If you want a little local Canadian flair added to your viewing, watch the Olympics via CTV’s dedicated online channel. Check the interactive Viewer’s Guide to find out which Canadian station will broadcast what event, including popular local channels like TSN and Sportsnet.

Our friends across the pond aren’t left out, either. BBC Sport plans to offer four separate live streams, as well as cranking out some content for its mobile site.

Unofficial Olympics Streaming Sites to Check

A few independent websites plan to offer live video streaming of the Olympics but most are unclear about where they’ll get their feeds. Most say they aggregate their videos “from a variety of sources” so, in the end they might not be the most reliable option. If they’re the only choice you’ve got, though, here are a couple of sites that look like they’re worth checking out:

If you’re worried online video streams sagging under the weight of too many viewers, one other option you’ve got is to find a friend with a Slingbox and beg access to it during the games. The cool gadget connects to a television and broadcasts programs to computers that are connected to the local network. The catch is, the TV needs to stay on the channel you want to watch, so your friend is out of luck if they want to view another program while you get your fill of downhill skiing.

Hooking the Slingbox up to an unused television and stashing it in another room usually solves that problem, but if your buddy goes to all this trouble for you, a really nice thank-you gift is in order. Alternatively, you could always just build your own Slingbox with Windows Media Center and a $60 TV tuner card.

Share Your Best Methods

So, Curling, here’s a few options to get you started on the road to 24/7 continuous Olympic viewing. We’ll update this post as we come across more options. Of course, dear readers, if you know of other sites where we can get our snowboarding groove on during the Olympics, be sure to share in the comments.

Love,
Lifehacker






Google Buzz Turns Less Creepy After Some Improvements [Google]

It feels like all of the nine million Google Buzz posts and comments flooded your inbox this week. And as if that wasn’t enough, suddenly that creepy ex started “following” you. Google has a fix for one of those issues.

As a result of user feedback, Google has made these little changes to turn Buzz into something slightly less creepy without having to resort to elaborate workarounds:

  • More visible option to not show followers/people you follow on your public profile
  • Ability to block anyone who starts following you
  • More clarity on which of your followers/people you follow can appear on your public profile

Now if only they could make the whole thing less annoying. [Gmail Blog]






Dell Mini 5: we have it (update: new pics and video!)

That’s right! After all those quick and dirty appearances, we’ve finally got our own Dell Mini 5 (aka “Streak” or “M01M“) prototype for a more in-depth look. Got a question about this mysterious beast? Drop us a line here and we’ll try to answer all your queries in our forthcoming impressions post.

Update: We’ve just added a bunch of new pics!

Update 2: And now we have a quick video after the break. You’re welcome.

Continue reading Dell Mini 5: we have it (update: new pics and video!)

Dell Mini 5: we have it (update: new pics and video!) originally appeared on Engadget on Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:53:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |   | Email this | Comments

How to Add Facebook Chat to Your IM Client [Facebook]

Facebook may have partnered with AIM to bring chat to your desktop, but if you’re not a fan of the official AIM client, there’s now an easy way to get Facebook Chat in the IM client of your choice.

Over a year ago, Facebook announced that they planned to support Facebook Chat over XMPP/Jabber, the same protocol that Google Talk uses, so people could use Facebook Chat in their favorite IM client—and then it was never mentioned again. Yesterday, though, Facebook announced that in addition to the AIM partnership, the XMPP/Jabber implementation had finally come to fruition.

If you are using a multi-protocol IM client such as Pidign, Adium, or iChat, set-up is really easy—you just add a new Jabber or XMPP account, the username being your username@chat.facebook.com, with your password being the same as your Facebook password. If you still haven't gotten a Facebook username (the tag that appears after www.facebook.com/ for your profile page) you'll need to go to your Settings page to enable it.

Once you log in, all your Facebook friends should show up in your buddy list. If this is good enough for you, that’s fine, but I found it really messed with my organization. Although Facebook lets you decide which friend lists do and do not show up in your IM client, it doesn’t seem to realize that those not on a list are important too—so if you have friends that aren't on a friend list, they'll just show up in a list called "Buddies" on your IM client, and there's no way to take them off (short of hiding that list client-side). Since most of my AIM and Gtalk contacts were already on a list called "Buddies", I had to create a new list for them to get my organization back on track. You may or may not care—it's just a warning that that list will likely be where all your unlisted Facebook friends go (at least it was for me).

Apart from that, everything else should be handled pretty well client-side. Profile thumbs are grabbed, Away in your client corresponds to Idle on Facebook, and, if you were previously using the unofficial add-on for adding Facebook Chat to Adium or Pidgin, you should find that the official route is far less flaky as far as connection goes. The service is pretty new, so there are bound to be a few bugs or hidden workarounds—if you find any, be sure to let us know in the comments! Thanks, brishu!






Stop Google Buzz From Showing the World Your Contacts [Privacy]

Whether you call it a huge privacy flaw or just an annoyance, Google Buzz can put the contacts you automatically follow—a.k.a. those you most frequently email or chat—on a public profile page. Here's how to undo that.

Google Blogoscoped’s Philipp Lenssen felt he had to avoid following certain Buzz contacts, as he didn't want to expose his social circle to the wider net. He's right—if you have a Google Profile, once you set up Buzz, those you’re following, and those following you, are shown on your profile page in a right-hand link list.

Update: This might not apply if you haven’t touched much inside Buzz, or haven’t set up a Google Profile, or that Profile is set to be hidden from the public. If so, you’re mostly in the clear. But keep in mind that, once you post to Buzz, your profile will likely be created, and you’ll want to know what’s getting put up on the web.

To turn this off, sign into your Google account (via Gmail or elsewhere) and head to your Google profile—that link should work if you're signed in. Look for the two links showing "Following X people" and "X people following me." There's a gray note underneath those numbers, indicating whether they're visible to just you or to everyone.

If they're visible to everyone, hit the "Edit Profile" link on the right-hand edge of the blue bar in the middle of the page, to the right of "About me," "Buzz," and "Contact info." In the third column of options there, there are checkboxes that control privacy features, and one of them is labeled "Display the list of people I'm following and people following me." Un-check that box, and now your list of followers and followees is private—or at least seen only by those you're following, perhaps.

Want Google Buzz gone entirely? Log into Gmail, then look at the bottom of your inbox page for a “Turn off Buzz” link. If you’re mainly annoyed at Buzz’s constant, um, buzzing, read up on removing Buzz updates from your inbox.

This tip came courtesy of Contributing Editor Lisa, who was similarly shocked to see Google dropping everyone’s frequently-contacted names on the net. If you’ve found a similarly crucial privacy tweak for Buzz, tell us about it in the comments.






Google Buzz Is a Dirty Snitch [Google]

When you join Google Buzz, it automatically provides you with followers and followees based on prior communication. These people are then listed on your Google profile, which can be seen by all your friends. So, affair havers: maybe hold off.

A lot of the Giz staff was alarmed by the suggested/automatic follower lists, not because they were automatic, but because it was hard to tell how exactly they were chosen. Obvious additions, like girlfriends or coworkers, seem to make the cut. Other entries were people that were rarely—and sometimes never—emailed from the associated account.

Anyway, point is, it’s an odd concept, made odder by the fact that, as the Silicon Alley Insider noticed, other people can see you’re following, including the auto-adds. To put this in real terms:

• A girl you slept with in college sends you a message on Gchat, to tell you she has five beautiful children now, and that she doesn’t ever think about you, ever. Ok!
• You exchange some messages and a couple emails to be polite. You defuse the situation. You don’t mention it to your current girlfriend, because that would be weird.
• Coincidentally, you enable Google Buzz, which adds both your current girlfriend and this lady who you politely deflected.
• Your girlfriend checks out your Google profile, sees your friends list, and asks you who that lady is.
• You clumsily try to explain, “Oh, it just adds people you talk to automatically,” which only makes things worse.
• Fight!
• …
• You break up, which was probably a good thing anyway, because your relationship sounded really unhealthy. But you get the point, right?

Since fixing this is as simple as toggling a privacy switch in your profile, it’s less of a disastrous bug than it is an unfortunate default behavior, and despite their early insistence that this is a feature, not a flaw, Google will probably adjust accordingly. Still though, Buzz hasn’t gotten off to the greatest start, has it? [Silicon Alley Insider]






YouTube filters offensive content

YouTube has introduced an optional "Safety Mode" filter designed to help users screen out potentially objectionable content.

<!–break–>

"An example of this type of content might be a newsworthy video that contains graphic violence such as a political protest or war coverage," explained Google spokesperson Jamie Davidson.

"While no filter is 100 percent perfect, Safety Mode is another step in our ongoing desire to give you greater control over the content you see on the site."

However, Sarah Perez of Read Write Web criticized the new filter, claiming that it failed to offer sufficient protection against the viewing of inappropriate content.

"Even if it's switched it on for a particular user account, the user can switch it off again just by scrolling to the bottom of the page," opined Perez.

"It may have been better if YouTube had introduced special ‘kid accounts’ which forced users on a particular computer to sign in in order to see YouTube videos. Once enabled on a PC, visitors to YouTube could have been presented with a sign-in box, not the YouTube homepage."



YouTube filters offensive contentAccording to Perez, the accounts would then be managed by parents empowered to enable and disable the filter at will. 



"Instead, the 'Safety Mode' feature looks as if it's an attempt to placate the FCC and worried parents while not actually providing a anything the average web-savvy kid couldn't figure out in 30 seconds flat.

"So parents, enable the filter if you must, but remember, no technology – and especially not this one – can serve as a replacement for actual parenting."